Create Account Create Account
300+ Completed Projects
500+ Grants
Texas Enterprise Fund (TEF): Deal-Closing Grants for Competing Texas Sites

Texas Enterprise Fund (TEF): Deal-Closing Grants for Competing Texas Sites

Secure "deal-closing" grants from the Texas Enterprise Fund to fuel your business expansion. Create jobs, boost investment, and choose Texas over competing states. Apply now!

Ongoing Rolling
Various Benefits
Texas
Grants For For-Profit Businesses
TL;DR

Key Takeaways

1

Apply before any location decision is made

2

Contract workers don't count toward targets

3

$1K non-refundable fee triggers due diligence

4

Awards rank by ROI not just eligibility

Your next step

Schedule Consultation Talk through fit, deadlines, and the best next move with Grantaura.

Sign in to pin this grant. You'll get deadline alerts, matched-grant context, and a task tracker — all tied to this opportunity.

Grant Overview

The Texas Enterprise Fund only works while Texas is still competing for your project. Sign the lease. Purchase the land. Make a public announcement about the city. Even bring on your first local hire for the new facility. Any one of those actions closes the TEF window - permanently, with no exceptions and no appeals.

That is the mechanic almost every description of this program gets wrong, including the official page. TEF is not a reward for choosing Texas. It is the negotiating tool the Texas Governor's office deploys during active site-selection competitions - used only when the outcome is still genuinely undecided. With roughly $356 million available for FY2024-25 and a rolling application period that has no fixed deadline, the fund is active right now. But the window is structural, not calendar-based. It closes the moment your company's location decision does.

Texas Enterprise Fund (TEF) Deal-Closing Grants for Competing Texas Sites

If your company is currently weighing a Texas site against a genuine out-of-state alternative, that is the window you are in.

Key Grant Information
Ongoing
01
02
Grant Snapshot
Grant Award
Various Benefits
Application Deadline
Rolling
Eligible Region
Texas
03
Eligibility and Benefits
Eligibility Criteria
  • One Texas site in active competition with at least one viable out-of-state location right now
  • No location decision yet made (no lease signed, no land purchased, no public announcement, no project hires)
  • 75 or more new direct permanent full-time jobs in urban areas or 25 or more in rural areas
  • Contract workers and temp staff excluded from all job counts
  • New job wages at or above the county average wage for the full contract term
  • Significant capital investment in fixed assets, real property, and business personal property (working capital excluded)
  • Local government incentive offers from city, county, and/or school district with stated dollar amounts
  • Company in good standing in state of formation with no delinquent Texas taxes
  • Advanced industry with genuine location options in other states or internationally
Grant Benefits
  • $75K to $21M+
  • Calculated via cost-benefit analysis model based on new direct jobs, average wages, and hiring timeline
  • Applications ranked competitively - highest projected ROI to Texas wins among all submitted applications
  • Approximately $356M available balance FY2024-25 (as of Oct 31 2025)
  • Performance-based cash grant disbursed only after annual job and wage targets are met
  • Clawback provisions enforce contract performance throughout the contract term
04
Focus Areas
Texas Enterprise Fund TEF grant Texas deal-closing grant Texas business expansion grant

Check Your Texas Enterprise Fund Eligibility

Grantaura's TEF Eligibility Checker maps your project's key parameters against the fund's core qualification gates. Competition status, job creation projections (after the contract worker exclusion is applied), wage levels against your specific county average, and planned capital investment - the tool covers all four and flags which gates need attention before you invest further time in this process.

It is built specifically to give you a structured read on where your project stands before you commit the $1,000 non-refundable application fee. No wading through portal documentation. No guessing whether your headcount clears the threshold once the contractor adjustment is applied.

If the checker shows a strong match, the right next step is not to go directly to the TEF Portal. Eligibility is rarely where TEF applications lose ground. The harder question is how the competing-site claim is documented and how the project narrative holds up under 11-step scrutiny. Submit an assessment to have our team review your project parameters before anything gets filed - and before the $1,000 fee is paid.

If the tool surfaces a problem - your eligible headcount falls short after excluding contractors, or you cannot document a genuine out-of-state competition - that is not a dead end. Our matched grants tool can surface programs that fit your actual project profile better than TEF does at this stage.

Not certain which outcome applies? A short consultation with a TEF-familiar specialist covers more ground faster than reading the portal documentation cold. Book a consultation here.

What the Texas Enterprise Fund Actually Is (and Is Not)

Most business incentive programs ask you to prove need. TEF asks something different entirely. It asks whether Texas is in an active competition right now, and whether your project is large enough to be worth the state's investment in winning that competition.

The Texas Legislature established the fund in 2003 with an initial $295 million. Since then it has been reappropriated during every single legislative session without interruption - 22 consecutive sessions through 2025. That streak matters if you are weighing whether this program will still be operating when your multi-year contract term ends. Most state incentive programs cannot point to that kind of track record.

What TEF is not: a foundation grant, a small business program, a startup incentive, or a subsidy for companies that have already committed to Texas. The official description uses the phrase "deal-closing" and that framing is exactly right. The state deploys TEF to win competitive business location decisions it would otherwise lose to other states or countries. And once you choose - once the decision is made - the state has no incentive to pay you for a choice you made on your own.

How TEF Award Amounts Are Calculated: No Published Cap, Competitive Ranking

There is no published maximum. No "$5 million ceiling." No per-job dollar figure in the program guidelines anywhere. Every award is calculated through a cost-benefit analysis model the state applies uniformly to each application.

The model weighs three variables: the number of new direct permanent jobs created, the average wages paid to those employees, and the expected hiring timeline. It projects the resulting increase in Texas sales tax revenues from those wages, then calculates the grant amount that produces a full return on the state's investment within the contract period. Higher wages, faster hiring, more jobs - all of those improve the calculation. But here is what most applicants do not realize. TEF applications also rank competitively against each other. It is not purely a pass/fail eligibility screen. The projects with the highest projected ROI to Texas win among all applications currently in the queue - which means your application is measured against a threshold and against every other project being reviewed at the same time.

How that plays out across verified awardees at different project scales:

Company
Industry
TEF Award
Jobs Committed
Eli Lilly and Co
Pharmaceutical Mfg$5.5M550
The Bank of Nova Scotia
Banking$10.77M1026
TIAA
Financial Services$18M2000
Samsung Austin Semiconductor
Semiconductors$17M1800
TMEIC Americas
Motor Manufacturing$368K62
Space Exploration Technologies
Space Vehicle Mfg$400K300

A 62-job manufacturing project in Waller County received $368,838 in April 2025. A 2,000-job financial services expansion received $18 million. The range is genuinely wide. Trying to estimate your award before understanding your exact wage levels and hiring timeline produces numbers that are not very meaningful. The formula does not simplify to a round figure, and the competitive ranking layer adds uncertainty that no formula can resolve without knowing what else is in the queue at the same time.

Legacy application documentation also references a veteran hiring incentive - an additional amount per qualified veteran hired in the first year of job creation. The current status and exact terms of this provision should be confirmed directly with the OOG before factoring it into any award projections.

Q: Is there a published maximum TEF award amount?
A: No. The award is calculated per project using a cost-benefit analysis model based on the number of direct permanent jobs, average wages, and hiring timeline. There is no published cap. Historical awards range from under $100,000 to over $20 million. Applications also rank competitively against each other - highest projected ROI to Texas wins among all active applications in the queue.

Texas Enterprise Fund Eligibility: The Gates That Actually Disqualify Projects

The eligibility rules for TEF are not ambiguous on paper. In practice, the hardest gate to satisfy is also the first one - and it is the one that closes most potential applications before they begin.

Gate 1: Active Out-of-State Competition

One Texas site must be in genuine, active competition with at least one viable out-of-state location. The key word is "viable." A nominal alternative that nobody seriously evaluated does not qualify. The 2014 Texas State Auditor's report (SAO Report No. 15-003) found that early-program reviews often lacked sufficient documentation to confirm that real competition existed. That history is precisely why the current application process places a high evidentiary burden on applicants. The OOG researches competing locations independently as part of its 11-step review - it does not simply accept the applicant's assertion.

Gate 2: No Location Decision Made

This gate is absolute. The following actions all permanently close the TEF window for a given project: signing a lease, purchasing land, hiring employees for the project, and making any public announcement about the location. All four. One is enough. There is no retroactive path and there are no exceptions.

Gate 3: Job Creation (and the Contract Worker Trap)

The project must create 75 new direct full-time jobs in urban areas, or 25 in rural areas. That threshold looks straightforward. It is not, for one specific reason.

Contract workers, temporary staff, and indirect employees are explicitly excluded from TEF job counts. Only direct, permanent full-time employees qualify. A company planning 100 new positions using a contractor-heavy staffing model may have well under 75 eligible jobs after that exclusion is applied. This is the most common headcount miscalculation in TEF applications, and it matters a great deal when the urban threshold is exactly 75.

Gate 4: Wages at or Above the County Average

New jobs must pay at or above the county average wage for the county where the project is located. Not just on day one - throughout the full term of the contract. Wages that slip below that benchmark in a later annual reporting period put the company in breach. Which county average applies depends entirely on the project location, and those averages vary considerably across Texas.

Gate 5: Capital Investment

The project must involve significant capital investment. There is no published minimum dollar figure - the OOG assesses this on a per-project basis relative to the industry and job count. Eligible capital investment covers fixed assets, real property, and business personal property. Working capital is excluded. Operational lease payments are excluded. A capital-light project with high headcount may find its eligible investment figure falls short of what the OOG expects for its industry.

Gate 6: Local Government Support with Dollar Amounts

The project must have formal support from local government - city, county, and/or school district - through incentive offers. Here is the trap that disqualifies applications before the OOG even begins reviewing them. The local incentive documentation must include estimated monetary values for all proposed local incentives. An application that describes local support without stating dollar amounts is deemed incomplete and is not reviewed. This is a completeness gate that operates before due diligence begins.

Gate 7: Financial Standing and Tax Compliance

The company must be well-established and financially sound, in good standing under the laws of its state of formation, and must owe no delinquent taxes to any Texas taxing unit. Texas Government Code Section 481.078(e-1) makes the last two requirements hard statutory conditions - not soft criteria. Unresolved franchise tax delinquency is a disqualifier. Both conditions are verified through the 11-step due diligence process.

The gates here are clear enough to read. Whether your project documentation - specifically the competing-site evidence, the adjusted headcount, and the local incentive package - will hold up under an 11-step review is a different question entirely. Submit an assessment and let our team check the substance of your application before you commit the $1,000 fee.

Q: Do contract workers count toward TEF job targets?
A: No. Contract workers, temporary staff, and indirect employees are explicitly excluded. Only direct, permanent full-time employees count toward the 75-job urban minimum or the 25-job rural minimum. This is the most common headcount miscalculation in TEF applications. Companies projecting headcount using a contractor-heavy staffing model should audit their eligible job count before applying - not after paying the $1,000 fee.

What "Active Competition" Actually Means in Practice

This is the gray zone the official page does not explain. It also carries the most practical ambiguity of any eligibility question in the program.

"Active competition" means a genuine out-of-state site is still being seriously evaluated as an alternative to the Texas location at the time of application. Not a site visit from three months ago that ended without follow-up. Not a brief consideration of other states that never progressed to formal analysis. A site that is still on the shortlist, still being actively compared, with no decision yet made.

What the OOG looks for: site-specific analysis, formal shortlist documentation, evidence of engagement with competing states or communities, or other demonstrable signals that the out-of-state alternative was a real option. The 2014 State Auditor's report confirmed that the state historically lacked evidence to verify many of these claims in early-program reviews - which is exactly why the current review places such weight on documentation. The burden of proof is squarely on the applicant.

Here is the honest version. If your site-selection process involved formal competing-site analysis with documented alternatives, you are in a strong position. If Texas was the preferred option from early in the process and other states were nominal mentions in an internal memo, the answer is less clear - and far less defensible under scrutiny. Unsure where your situation falls? A consultation with our team covers that question quickly and without committing you to an application.

Q: When exactly should I apply for the Texas Enterprise Fund?
A: Before any location decision is made - before signing a lease, purchasing land, hiring employees for the project, or making any public announcement. TEF has a rolling application period with no fixed calendar deadline. The relevant deadline is structural: it is tied to your company's internal decision timeline, not a date on the program calendar. Apply too late and there is no retroactive path. There are no exceptions.

The Application Process: What the 11-Step Review Actually Examines

There is a $1,000 non-refundable application fee. It is payable to the Office of the Governor and it triggers the start of the due diligence process. Almost every third-party description of TEF leaves this out. Plan for it before you begin.

Applications are submitted through the TEF Portal at tef-portal.gov.texas.gov. The portal supports three registration roles: Business Representative, Local Community Representative, and Authorized Consultant. Three conditions must all be met before the 11-step review begins: the application must be complete, the fee must be received, and all milestone dates in your hiring schedule must be set at least one full quarter after your submission date. A hiring schedule with milestone dates that are too close to submission is not reviewed.

The 11 areas the review examines: program application review, project executive summary analysis, applicant management and current news research, corporate tax status verification, business climate evaluation and comparison against competing locations, economic impact assessment from a third-party report, corporate financial analysis, credit assessment, local and state economic incentive package review, project cost-benefit analysis and return-on-investment calculation, and project clawback analysis. That final step matters because the OOG does not take the applicant's word on what competing states are offering. It researches those locations independently and builds its own assessment of the out-of-state business environment.

After the review, all three of these must agree unanimously: the Governor of Texas, the Lieutenant Governor, and the Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives. Not a majority. One veto stops the grant regardless of how strong the due diligence outcome is. How long does the full process take? Honestly, the standard timeline is not publicly confirmed anywhere. The program does not publish processing timelines and any specific figure from third-party sources is unverified. Plan for several months minimum in your site-selection schedule.

Q: Is there an application fee for the Texas Enterprise Fund?
A: Yes. A $1,000 non-refundable fee is required and payable to the Office of the Governor. The 11-step due diligence review does not begin until both the fee is received and the application is complete. This is confirmed by the TEF Portal and is omitted by nearly every third-party description of the program. Budget for it before starting the application process.

Most TEF applications that fail do not fail on eligibility. They fail on how the competing-site claim is documented and how the project narrative holds up when the OOG independently researches your competing location.

Coordinating Local Incentives Alongside TEF

TEF does not work alone. Most successful TEF awards are announced simultaneously with a local property tax abatement or other municipal incentive from the city, county, or school district where the project is located. The April 2025 announcement for TMEIC Americas in Waller County made this dynamic explicit - the company's CEO cited both the TEF grant and the local property tax abatement as decisive factors in choosing Texas. This is not coincidence in TEF awards. It is structural.

The CBA model that calculates your TEF award looks at the total economic return to Texas from your project. A stronger combined incentive package from both the state and the local community makes the Texas proposition more competitive against the out-of-state alternative - which strengthens your competitive ranking relative to other applications in the queue. Engaging with the local economic development corporation simultaneously with your TEF preparation, not sequentially, is the right approach. The local incentive package must be in the application and it must include dollar amounts. There is no way to complete a qualifying application without it.

The Strategic Disclosure Problem

There is a genuine tension most applicants do not think through until it is too late. Documenting out-of-state competition for TEF purposes creates a risk: you may weaken your negotiating position with those other states. Companies worry that revealing Texas interest signals they have already made up their minds. They are right to worry about that. But TEF requires documented out-of-state competition. You cannot hide your Texas discussions and still satisfy the evidentiary requirement.

The solution is structural. Running a simultaneous formal RFP process to multiple states - with Texas included formally as one of several recipients - satisfies TEF's competition requirement while maintaining leverage with every location in the process. The OOG understands this dynamic and wants to see genuine competitive uncertainty, not theater. An RFP that went to four states with documented responses is credible evidence of active competition. An internal memo noting that someone once mentioned another state is not.

Coordinate this with your local EDC early. The economic development corporation for your target Texas community is also your ally in making the combined state-and-local incentive package compelling enough to document as decisive. Each commitment - local and state - strengthens the other during parallel negotiations. That is the mechanics of a TEF-compatible site-selection process.

The TEF Performance Contract: What Your Company Actually Signs

Winning a TEF award does not mean receiving money. What TEF approval actually means is entering a multi-year contractual obligation to deliver on job creation and wage commitments, with cash disbursement tied to hitting those targets in each annual reporting period. No targets met, no disbursement for that period.

Miss targets across periods and there are clawbacks. The state has recovered $36.6 million in liquidated damages across the program's full history. That number is a small fraction of total disbursements - which is the honest way to frame it. Companies that consistently meet their targets are not affected by clawback provisions. But the OOG enforces them actively when triggered, and the Governor's office reserves the right to conduct on-site compliance reviews at any point during the contract term.

Two requirements tend to surprise first-time TEF applicants specifically:

  • Form 1295 (Disclosure of Interested Parties) - filed electronically with the Texas Ethics Commission at contract execution. Every adviser, broker, or intermediary who helped facilitate the contract must be disclosed here, including external grant consultants. The form is submitted via the Texas Ethics Commission portal and a signed copy goes to the OOG. Missing this at execution delays contract signing.
  • Press release participation is mandatory - every TEF awardee must participate in a Governor's Office press release announcing the project and the award amount. Not optional. Not negotiable. Factor this into your communications and PR planning well before contract execution.

Q: What happens if a company misses its TEF job creation or wage targets?
A: Clawback provisions in the TEF contract allow the OOG to demand repayment of previously disbursed grant funds if the company fails to meet its performance commitments. The state has recovered $36.6 million in liquidated damages across the program's history. The OOG also has the right to conduct on-site compliance reviews at any point during the contract term. Companies that consistently hit their annual targets are not affected - but the enforcement mechanisms are real and active.

TEF Confidentiality: Texas Government Code Section 552.131

This is something most applicants never think to ask about. It matters more than it looks.

TEF application information - negotiation details, competing-site documentation, award discussions, and application materials - is protected as confidential under Texas Government Code Section 552.131, the Economic Development Negotiations exception to the Public Information Act. The OOG invokes this exemption against any public records request that comes in while an application is being actively processed. Your application is not a public document during the negotiation phase.

What it does not cover: confidentiality breach on the applicant's side. If your company discloses negotiation details publicly before a final agreement is reached, the OOG can treat that breach as grounds to terminate negotiations. Keep the process quiet internally until the Governor's press release goes out - which is mandatory for all awardees anyway.

Q: Is the Texas Enterprise Fund application confidential?
A: Yes. Application information and negotiation details are protected under Texas Government Code Section 552.131 (Economic Development Negotiations exception) until an agreement is finalized. The OOG invokes this exemption against Public Information Act requests during active negotiations. Applicants should maintain confidentiality on their side as well - breach by the applicant is grounds for termination of negotiations.

TEF Awardees: Real Industries, Real Award Amounts

TEF has been running since 2003. More than 211 projects have been contracted since inception, representing over $58.7 billion in company capital investment commitments at the time of award. The 2023-2024 reporting period alone saw 3,113 new jobs committed and $4.44 billion in capital investment across new TEF contracts.

The industries in the awardee record give a practical sense of what "advanced industry with multi-state location options" actually covers:

Advanced Manufacturing: Toyota Motor North America (Plano) and Caterpillar among past awardees, Semiconductors: Samsung Austin Semiconductor ($17M award) and Texas Instruments (Richardson), Financial Services: Charles Schwab Westlake ($6M) and TIAA Frisco ($18M), Pharmaceutical and Biotech: Eli Lilly Houston ($5.5M in 2025) and Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies (College Station), Technology and IT Services: Uber Technologies Dallas ($3M - 3000 jobs) and multiple IT outsourcing firms, Food and Dairy Processing: Leprino Foods Lubbock and Great Lakes Cheese Abilene, Steel and Heavy Manufacturing: JSW Steel Baytown and Steel Dynamics Southwest Sinton]

TEF works across a genuinely wide project-size range. The same program that handled a $368,838 award for a 62-job project in 2025 also processed an $18 million award for a 2,000-job expansion. The same industry can produce different award amounts in different cycles depending on wages and capital investment. Every single awardee from 2004 onward participated in a press release with the Governor's office - more than 20 years of announcements, all publicly searchable.

Q: What industries qualify for the Texas Enterprise Fund?
A: Companies in advanced industries that could genuinely locate in another state or country. Historical awardees span aerospace, automotive, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, semiconductors, financial services, food processing, technology, manufacturing, and logistics. The common thread across all of them: each company could credibly have chosen a different state or country, making the Texas site competition authentic.

Q: How durable is the TEF program - will it still be funded in future years?
A: TEF has been reappropriated by the Texas Legislature in every legislative session since its establishment in 2003 - 22 consecutive sessions without interruption. As of October 31 2025, the FY2024-25 available balance is approximately $356 million. That combination of continuous legislative reappropriation and confirmed available funds is the strongest program durability signal a Texas incentive program can offer.

More Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the Texas Enterprise Fund in plain terms?
A: A performance-based cash grant program run by the Office of the Texas Governor. The state awards it to companies during active site-selection processes where one Texas location is genuinely competing with at least one out-of-state alternative. Award amounts are calculated using a cost-benefit model and disbursed only after the company meets annual job and wage targets under a signed contract. Rolling application period. No fixed calendar deadline.

Q: How formal does the out-of-state competition need to be?
A: Formal enough to be independently verifiable. The OOG researches competing locations on its own and compares that research against your application. It looks for formal shortlist documentation, site-specific analysis, or evidence of engagement with competing states - not a passing mention of another location. The 2014 State Auditor's report identified weak competition documentation as the most common historical vulnerability in TEF applications. If you are uncertain whether your situation qualifies, submit an assessment before paying the fee.

Key Terms for Texas Enterprise Fund Applicants

  • Deal-Closing Grant - TEF's official program classification. A deal-closing grant is designed to tip a location decision, not reward one already made. The phrase appears in official program materials and is what distinguishes TEF from general economic development grants that do not require active out-of-state competition as a condition of eligibility.
  • Active Competition Requirement - The core eligibility gate and the hardest one to satisfy with documentation. One Texas site must be in genuine, active competition with at least one viable out-of-state location at the time of application. The 2014 State Auditor's report confirmed that early TEF reviews frequently lacked evidence to verify this claim, which is precisely why the current process places a high documentation burden on applicants.
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) Scoring Model - The analytical model the OOG applies uniformly to every TEF application. It projects the increase in Texas sales tax revenues from new employee wages and calculates the grant amount that produces a full state return on investment within the contract period. Applications also rank competitively against each other using this model - highest projected ROI to Texas wins.
  • Contract Worker Exclusion - Contract workers, temp staff, and indirect employees are explicitly excluded from TEF job creation counts. Only direct, permanent full-time employees count toward the 75-job urban minimum or the 25-job rural minimum. This is the most common calculation error in applications from companies using contractor-heavy staffing models.
  • County Average Wage - The wage benchmark TEF-eligible jobs must meet or exceed. It is the average wage for the specific county where the project is located, not a statewide figure. The requirement applies for the full term of the contract - not just at the start of hiring. Annual reporting periods verify ongoing compliance throughout.
  • Capital Investment (TEF Definition) - Eligible capital investment for TEF purposes covers fixed assets, real property, and business personal property. Working capital is excluded. Operational lease payments are excluded. A capital-light project with high headcount may find its eligible investment figure falls short of what the OOG expects for its industry and job count combination.
  • 11-Step Due Diligence Process - The review process every TEF application undergoes before reaching the approval stage. The areas examined include application review, project executive summary analysis, management and news research, corporate tax status verification, business climate comparison against competing locations, economic impact assessment, corporate financial analysis, credit assessment, local and state incentive package review, project cost-benefit analysis, and clawback analysis. The full checklist is accessible via the TEF Portal (login required) and is not publicly published in full.
  • Tri-Leadership Unanimous Approval - The political approval requirement that is unique to TEF among major state incentive programs. The Governor of Texas, the Lieutenant Governor, and the Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives must all individually agree to support each TEF award. Unanimously. Not a majority vote. One veto stops the grant regardless of the due diligence outcome.
  • Performance Contract - The agreement signed between the TEF awardee and the State of Texas before any funds are disbursed. The contract specifies job creation targets, wage levels, and reporting requirements for each period of the contract term. Disbursement is tied to meeting those targets in each period - not to signing the contract itself.
  • Clawback Provision - A contractual clause allowing the OOG to demand repayment of previously disbursed TEF grant funds if the company fails to meet its performance commitments. The state has recovered $36.6 million in liquidated damages across the program's history. The OOG also has the right to conduct on-site compliance reviews during the contract term to verify performance data.
  • Form 1295 (Disclosure of Interested Parties) - A Texas Ethics Commission form required at TEF contract execution. It discloses all controlling interests and intermediaries - including grant consultants and advisers - who helped facilitate the contract. Filed electronically via the Texas Ethics Commission portal, with a signed copy submitted to the OOG. Late or missing filing delays contract execution. Plan for this from the start of any advisory engagement.
  • Local Incentive Package - The formal incentive offer from the city, county, and/or school district supporting the TEF project. Required for eligibility. The documentation must include estimated monetary values for all proposed local incentives. An application that describes local support without stating dollar amounts is deemed incomplete by the OOG and is not reviewed - this completeness gate operates before the 11-step due diligence begins.
  • TEF Portal - The online application platform at tef-portal.gov.texas.gov where TEF applications are submitted. Supports three registration roles: Business Representative, Local Community Representative, and Authorized Consultant. The portal is where the $1,000 application fee is paid, applications are submitted, and milestone hiring schedules are entered.
  • Confidentiality Protection (Section 552.131) - The Texas Government Code provision that protects TEF application information from public disclosure during the negotiation phase. The OOG invokes this exemption - formally the Economic Development Negotiations exception - against Public Information Act requests while applications are being processed. Applicants who disclose negotiation details publicly before a final agreement is reached risk termination of negotiations by the OOG.
  • Rolling Application Period - TEF has no fixed annual deadline, no cohort cycle, and no application window that opens and closes on a calendar schedule. Applications are accepted at any time via the TEF Portal and reviewed on an ongoing basis. The relevant deadline for any specific project is the date of the location decision - which closes eligibility permanently. There is no "next cycle" to wait for if a company misses the window for a given project.
  • Urban vs. Rural Job Threshold - TEF applies different minimum job creation thresholds depending on project site classification. Urban projects must create 75 or more new direct permanent full-time jobs. Rural projects must create 25 or more. The distinction matters significantly for smaller projects in rural Texas counties that would fall below the urban threshold but remain eligible under the rural classification.
  • Milestone Dates - The projected job creation milestones submitted as part of the TEF application's hiring schedule. Milestone dates must be set at least one full quarter after the application submission date. This prevents retroactive or near-term claims and establishes the timeline that the performance contract and disbursement schedule will follow. Applications with milestone dates that are too close to submission are not reviewed.

Related Texas Business Expansion and Economic Development Grants

TEF is the most prominent Texas state incentive for large competitive business expansions, but it is one program in a broader landscape. Companies that qualify for TEF often qualify for additional programs that can be coordinated with a TEF award - and companies that do not meet the active competition requirement still have meaningful Texas incentive options worth exploring.

Grantaura's matched grants tool draws from a continuously updated database to surface programs relevant to your specific project profile, industry, and location. It covers federal, state, and local programs that most site-selection processes never surface. Explore matched grants here.

  1. Texas tax incentive program for qualifying energy and technology projects. Lower job thresholds than TEF. Suitable for projects that do not meet TEF's 75-job urban requirement but still create significant employment.

Texas Enterprise Fund Expert Review: What Getting It Right Before Submission Looks Like

The eligibility rules for TEF are publicly documented. If you have read this page carefully, you now understand what the program requires. That is not where TEF applications go wrong.

Where they go wrong is specific. How the competing-site claim is framed when the OOG reads it against its own independent research on that location. Whether the headcount projection has correctly excluded every contractor and temp position. Whether the local incentive documentation actually includes dollar amounts or just describes the support in general terms. Whether the capital investment schedule correctly separates eligible fixed assets from excluded working capital. Whether the CBA inputs - wages, timeline, job count - are structured to present the project's strongest ROI case rather than just its baseline numbers. These are application-stage problems, not eligibility problems. They are not things this page can resolve for you.

What Grantaura's TEF application specialists do:

  • Review your competing-site documentation before submission - specifically how the out-of-state competition is described and evidenced. The 2014 State Auditor's report flagged this section as historically under-documented, and it remains the highest-scrutiny area of the current review.
  • Audit your headcount breakdown to confirm the eligible direct permanent FTE count after the contract worker exclusion is applied - before the application is filed.
  • Review your capital investment schedule for correct classification, separating eligible fixed assets and real property from excluded working capital and operational leases.
  • Check your local incentive documentation to ensure monetary dollar amounts are present and clearly stated - catching the completeness gate that disqualifies applications before due diligence even begins.
  • Structure your CBA inputs to reflect your project's strongest ROI case to the state, not just the default projection from your internal numbers.
  • Flag Form 1295 requirements and disclosure obligations before contract execution, so nothing delays the signing timeline after approval is granted.
  • Support post-award contract compliance and annual performance reporting throughout the contract term - because managing ongoing clawback risk is a separate problem from winning the grant.

TEF awards can reach into the millions. The application involves 11-step due diligence, three-way political approval, a competitive CBA ranking, and a multi-year performance contract. Expert review before submission is not a luxury for this category of application - it is practical risk management for any company taking the program seriously.


Book a Consultation

About the Author

This listing was researched and written by Imran, founder of Grantaura. Imran built Grantaura because he believed that grant intelligence - the real kind, with sources checked, unknowns acknowledged, and competitor pages actually read - should not require expensive insider access or a retainer. His approach is evidence-first: every fact sourced, every gap named honestly, every conclusion traced back to something verifiable. If something on this page is wrong, outdated, or missing, he wants to know. Learn more about Imran here. If you want to talk through your specific application situation before committing further time to it, book a consultation here.

 

Expert Guidance

How to apply for this grant

We are your trusted grant application partners. You can navigate the entire grant application process with our expert guidance through this simple 5-step process.

300+ Projects
4.9/5 Rating
Expert Team

Step 1: Application Form

Fill out the "Apply for this grant" form with your information and grant requirements.

Step 2: Eligibility Assessment

Our grant experts will assess your eligibility and notify you via email.

Step 3: Expert Consultation

A dedicated grant expert will be assigned to discuss next steps for your application.

Step 4: Application Submission

Our expert will help you complete and submit your application with all required materials.

Step 5: Final Decision

The grant committee will make their decision and notify successful applicants.

Expert Guided

Expert guidance at every step

Our team of grant experts with 300+ successful projects will guide you through the entire application process.

Fast Response
4.9/5 Rating
100% Secure
Schedule a free consultation
Profile image of Imran Ahmad
About the Author

Imran Ahmad

As the founder of Grantaura, I've dedicated myself to demystifying the grant funding process. My goal is simple: to empower entrepreneurs, non-profits, and innovators like you to secure the capital needed to make a real impact. Let's build your funding strategy together.